The peculiarity of my Aeolus 7800 GT
I was turning on my PC last night and as usual, the monitor will display the BIOS reading of the graphics card installed in the system. Initially I didn't notice this, it happened in a glimpse that somehow there's something strange about the VGA BIOS reading. I restarted the PC and with the virtue of 1 MP handphone camera, I took a snap at it real quick. Let's have a look :
![7800 GT bios](http://static.flickr.com/41/110409706_b9ed6365a1.jpg)
There it is, one line that says it all, "Engineering Release - Not For Production Use". If I am one of AnandTech's hardware reviewers, I probably won't bother about this at all. Hardware reviewers are regularly being provided with engineering sample of a product to be reviewed.
Then how on earth that I could end up buying an engineering sample of 7800 GT in the retail market? This really boils my blood as this is the second time I think that I've been tricked into buying an 'unpure' retail graphics card. First one was the former Sapphire X800 GTO FireBlade, where I discovered that its BIOS has been tampered with. Why not? A default clock of 500/550 core/memory as reported by RaBIT? Malaysia PC retailers must have been fuggin' retarded! Not all of them, but enough to fool a few enthusiasts around! Talk about customer rights to curb unhealthy business ethique here? I must be dreaming!!
Anyway, I made some further investigation regarding the 7800 GT BIOS. I used NiBiTor from MKVTech to go into the details of the BIOS. Guess what I've found??
![nibitor my BIOS](http://static.flickr.com/51/110409707_278f00f365.jpg)
The 'Engineering Release' tickbox is ticked, which proves that my 7800 GT is indeed an engineering sample. I also made the same test with a few other 7800 BIOSes : reference NVidia card, XFX, Palit and ASUS. None of them indicated an engineering sample BIOS.
Another thing that I observed was that the BIOS revision, 05.70.02.13.00 seemed a bit odd since even the reference NVidia BIOS's revision itself was 05.70.02.13.01 while the other BIOSes were even reporting .02 and even .12 for XFX.
I guess this can be listed as the fourth reason why this card was sold very cheap for a 7800 GT.
Either the retailer or AOpen itself is responsible for this mess..
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home